ÃÊ·Ï ¿­±â/´Ý±â ¹öÆ°

º» ¿¬±¸´Â ´ëÇлýµéÀÇ Àڻ쿹¹æ °ÔÀÌƮŰÆÛ ±³À°ÀÇ È¿°ú¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀνÄÀ» Ž±¸Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ¼öÇà µÈ ÁúÀû ¿¬±¸ÀÌ´Ù. °ÔÀÌƮŰÆÛ ±³À°À» ¼ö°­ÇÑ ÀÌÈÄ Ä£±¸ÀÇ ÀÚ»ìÀ§±â¸¦ °æÇèÇÑ ´ëÇлý 22¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸ ·Î ¹Ý±¸Á¶È­ ÀÎÅͺ並 ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖÁ¦ºÐ¼® ¹æ¹ýÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú 8°³ÀÇ »óÀ§¹ü ÁÖ¿Í 16°³ÀÇ ÇÏÀ§¹üÁÖ°¡ µµÃâµÇ¾ú´Ù. ±³À°ÀÌ Ä£±¸ÀÇ ÀÚ»ìÀ§±â¸¦ ´ëóÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µÇ¾ú´ø ºÎºÐÀº ÁÖº¯ÀÎÀÇ ÀÚ»ì ¡ÈÄ¿¡ °üÇÑ °ü½É Áõ°¡ ¹× ÀÚ»ìÀ§Ç豺¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëóÀü·« Çâ»óÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¹Ý¸é µµ ¿òÀÌ µÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´ø ÀÌÀ¯´Â ºÎ½ÇÇÑ ±³À° ³»¿ë, ±â¾ï³ªÁö ¾Ê´Â ±³À° ³»¿ë, ±×¸®°í Àû¿ëÀÌ ¾î·Á¿î ±³À° ³»¿ëÀ¸·Î º¸°íµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î Âü¿©ÀÚµéÀº °ÔÀÌƮŰÆÛ ±³À°À» º¸¿ÏÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ½Ç¿ëÀû Á¤º¸ Á¦ °ø, °ÔÀÌƮŰÆÛ º¸È£¸¦ À§ÇÑ ±³À°, ±³À° ¹æ½Ä¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¯È­¸¦ Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î °Ô ÀÌƮŰÆÛ ±³À°ÀÇ ½ÇÈ¿¼ºÀ» ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇÑ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¹æ¾È¿¡ ´ëÇØ ³íÀÇÇÏ¿´´Ù.

The purpose of this qualitative study was to college students¡¯ perceptions regarding the effectiveness of gatekeeper training. Twenty-two participants who experienced a friend¡¯s suicide crisis on campus were recruited for semi-structured interviews. Eight categories and 16 subcategories were found as a result of thematic analysis. First, increased interest in warning signs and coping skills were found as the helpful parts of training. Second, poor educational content, immemorable education, and inapplicable content were found as the unhelpful parts of training. Lastly, participants suggested that gatekeeper training should deal with more useful contents of gatekeeping, protection of gatekeepers, and reform of educational methods. Based on these findings, diverse ways to increase the effectiveness of gatekeeper training were discussed.



Å°¿öµå¿­±â/´Ý±â ¹öÆ°

, , , ,

Suicide prevention, Gatekeeper training, Suicide crisis, College students, Thematic analysis